<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The absolutely maddening &#8220;Google Dance&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggasm.com/the-absolutely-maddening-google-dance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggasm.com/the-absolutely-maddening-google-dance</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/the-absolutely-maddening-google-dance/comment-page-1#comment-57007</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/the-absolutely-maddening-google-dance#comment-57007</guid>
		<description>Thank GOD for Richard Dawkins.  (See what I did there?  Heh heh.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank GOD for Richard Dawkins.  (See what I did there?  Heh heh.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ward</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/the-absolutely-maddening-google-dance/comment-page-1#comment-56964</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/the-absolutely-maddening-google-dance#comment-56964</guid>
		<description>&quot;ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s coldly telling you that youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re not the expert that you previously were...&quot;

I wouldn&#039;t say it exactly like that, Simon.  It&#039;s more like Google&#039;s telling you that they&#039;ve come up with a new (and, according to them, better) way of ranking expertise, and that your new rankings are the result of that.  It&#039;s harsh, I know, but Google never performs such updates maliciously; they&#039;re making a genuine effort to improve their index for users.  Overall, they do a pretty good job of it.  That&#039;s how they dominate the search market, after all.  Still, such changes are painful for more than a few.  If you don&#039;t believe me, just read around &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmasterworld.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Webmaster World&lt;/a&gt; for awhile.

Although it&#039;s entirely possible that blogs in general are being devalued from one algorithmic shift to the next, I sincerely doubt they&#039;ll be removed from the main index, Nick.  If anything, Google&#039;s move toward universal search is causing more blending of search results, not less.  Google Blog Search is intended more as a specialized version of the main Google index, not a way to shunt blogs off to the side.  Trust me, Google likes blogs far too much to do that.  After all, that&#039;s why they bought Blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s coldly telling you that youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re not the expert that you previously were&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say it exactly like that, Simon.  It&#8217;s more like Google&#8217;s telling you that they&#8217;ve come up with a new (and, according to them, better) way of ranking expertise, and that your new rankings are the result of that.  It&#8217;s harsh, I know, but Google never performs such updates maliciously; they&#8217;re making a genuine effort to improve their index for users.  Overall, they do a pretty good job of it.  That&#8217;s how they dominate the search market, after all.  Still, such changes are painful for more than a few.  If you don&#8217;t believe me, just read around <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/" rel="nofollow">Webmaster World</a> for awhile.</p>
<p>Although it&#8217;s entirely possible that blogs in general are being devalued from one algorithmic shift to the next, I sincerely doubt they&#8217;ll be removed from the main index, Nick.  If anything, Google&#8217;s move toward universal search is causing more blending of search results, not less.  Google Blog Search is intended more as a specialized version of the main Google index, not a way to shunt blogs off to the side.  Trust me, Google likes blogs far too much to do that.  After all, that&#8217;s why they bought Blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoo Hoo Nick</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/the-absolutely-maddening-google-dance/comment-page-1#comment-56940</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoo Hoo Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/the-absolutely-maddening-google-dance#comment-56940</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have the time to do the research right now, but i slightly remember just over two years ago that they were talking on twit about google blog search. As far as I remember Dvorak predicted that perhaps Google is trying to take blogs away from their main search results and consider non-blog content more relevant by default. Then in order to find stuff that is written on blog, one would use google blog search. 
I vaguely remember someone on twit saying something like, blog search would give google the excuse to completely remove blogs from their search, cause there&#039;s blog search if you want to find blogs. 

Anyway, i&#039;ll copy your list of links and will post them on my own blog, hopefully it helps for your ranking. And I encourage other readers to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have the time to do the research right now, but i slightly remember just over two years ago that they were talking on twit about google blog search. As far as I remember Dvorak predicted that perhaps Google is trying to take blogs away from their main search results and consider non-blog content more relevant by default. Then in order to find stuff that is written on blog, one would use google blog search.<br />
I vaguely remember someone on twit saying something like, blog search would give google the excuse to completely remove blogs from their search, cause there&#8217;s blog search if you want to find blogs. </p>
<p>Anyway, i&#8217;ll copy your list of links and will post them on my own blog, hopefully it helps for your ranking. And I encourage other readers to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
