<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking Points Memo bloggers won&#8217;t comment on Maureen Dowd controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy/comment-page-1#comment-83618</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2722#comment-83618</guid>
		<description>Marshall posted about it, finally.  Class: 

Very Briefly on Dowd

I generally think we&#039;re too quick to pull the trigger with charges of plagiarism. I haven&#039;t said anything about this because I really didn&#039;t think I had anything to add. Whatever the mechanics of how it happened, I never thought it was intentional. Dowd and the Times quickly corrected it, which I appreciated. And for me, that&#039;s pretty much the end of it.

--Josh Marshall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall posted about it, finally.  Class: </p>
<p>Very Briefly on Dowd</p>
<p>I generally think we&#8217;re too quick to pull the trigger with charges of plagiarism. I haven&#8217;t said anything about this because I really didn&#8217;t think I had anything to add. Whatever the mechanics of how it happened, I never thought it was intentional. Dowd and the Times quickly corrected it, which I appreciated. And for me, that&#8217;s pretty much the end of it.</p>
<p>&#8211;Josh Marshall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy/comment-page-1#comment-83590</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2722#comment-83590</guid>
		<description>Simon, 
Thanks for the email. I have quoted your post on my site and linked back to you. 

Thanks for the heads up and the shout out. 

It means a lot. 

Annette</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon,<br />
Thanks for the email. I have quoted your post on my site and linked back to you. </p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up and the shout out. </p>
<p>It means a lot. </p>
<p>Annette</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fishbane</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy/comment-page-1#comment-83589</link>
		<dc:creator>fishbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2722#comment-83589</guid>
		<description>I think Drew is right on here - there is simply no reason for Josh to comment. I don&#039;t think I would here, either - the facts are plain, his reputation is only burnished by this, and displaying class and maturity just makes me like him all that much more.

If I were quoted (with or without attribution) by the NYT, That in and of itself would be a wonderful moment in the sun. Why ruin it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Drew is right on here &#8211; there is simply no reason for Josh to comment. I don&#8217;t think I would here, either &#8211; the facts are plain, his reputation is only burnished by this, and displaying class and maturity just makes me like him all that much more.</p>
<p>If I were quoted (with or without attribution) by the NYT, That in and of itself would be a wonderful moment in the sun. Why ruin it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy/comment-page-1#comment-83587</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2722#comment-83587</guid>
		<description>Seems like a win win for Marshall no matter what happens.  He a) got his actually message on the subject out to a wider audience and b) he and his site will get an incredible amount of free publicity from a mention in the Times and countless other sites talking it up.  No matter what happens to Dowd he benefits from just letting it ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a win win for Marshall no matter what happens.  He a) got his actually message on the subject out to a wider audience and b) he and his site will get an incredible amount of free publicity from a mention in the Times and countless other sites talking it up.  No matter what happens to Dowd he benefits from just letting it ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogers Cadenhead</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy/comment-page-1#comment-83585</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogers Cadenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2722#comment-83585</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it shows class, I think it shows he&#039;s afraid of making enemies at &lt;i&gt;The Times&lt;/i&gt;. It&#039;s definitely weird to give a no comment when you&#039;re completely in the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it shows class, I think it shows he&#8217;s afraid of making enemies at <i>The Times</i>. It&#8217;s definitely weird to give a no comment when you&#8217;re completely in the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Kane</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy/comment-page-1#comment-83583</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2722#comment-83583</guid>
		<description>Q: &quot;I can&#039;t help but wonder why Marshall doesn&#039;t want to comment on this issue.&quot;

A: It&#039;s called &quot;class&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: &#8220;I can&#8217;t help but wonder why Marshall doesn&#8217;t want to comment on this issue.&#8221;</p>
<p>A: It&#8217;s called &#8220;class&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Kramden</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/talking-points-memo-bloggers-wont-comment-on-maureen-dowd-controversy/comment-page-1#comment-83582</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Kramden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2722#comment-83582</guid>
		<description>&quot;I canâ€™t help but wonder why Marshall doesnâ€™t want to comment on this issue.&quot;

Well, OK, but what do you suppose Marshall might want to say?  I think the incident pretty much speaks for itself, and I can&#039;t imagine a comment from Josh that would illumine it any further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I canâ€™t help but wonder why Marshall doesnâ€™t want to comment on this issue.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, OK, but what do you suppose Marshall might want to say?  I think the incident pretty much speaks for itself, and I can&#8217;t imagine a comment from Josh that would illumine it any further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
