<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neil Gaiman&#8217;s ebook results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggasm.com/neil-gaiman/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggasm.com/neil-gaiman</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Burns</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/neil-gaiman/comment-page-1#comment-77195</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/neil-gaiman#comment-77195</guid>
		<description>Obviously, it&#039;s a big advantage to offer an e-book if you&#039;re Neil Gaiman as opposed to Cliff Burns, just as it&#039;s easier for Radiohead and Trent Reznor to release their work without the benefit of record companies.  Less well-known groups aren&#039;t going to have two millions downloads (or whatever). However, these technologies are still emerging and the dust has yet to settle. I decided to publish on-line to protect my work from inept tampering AND to access readers directly--in both cases the decision has turned out great for me. Some writers use their sites as promotional tools but I&#039;ve decided to go one further. I no longer submit work anywhere, nor will I sign any deal with a publisher that doesn&#039;t retain my autonomy and give me control over cover design, layout, input on promotion, etc. As I wrote on Redroom: I&#039;d rather starve in a garret than sell out like a whore and live in a mansion. I&#039;ve walked away from a movie deal, anthology appearances, publishers and agents because they failed to meet my terms. &quot;Integrity&quot; isn&#039;t the brand name of a shampoo, it&#039;s fundamental to my approach to my work, my ART...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, it&#8217;s a big advantage to offer an e-book if you&#8217;re Neil Gaiman as opposed to Cliff Burns, just as it&#8217;s easier for Radiohead and Trent Reznor to release their work without the benefit of record companies.  Less well-known groups aren&#8217;t going to have two millions downloads (or whatever). However, these technologies are still emerging and the dust has yet to settle. I decided to publish on-line to protect my work from inept tampering AND to access readers directly&#8211;in both cases the decision has turned out great for me. Some writers use their sites as promotional tools but I&#8217;ve decided to go one further. I no longer submit work anywhere, nor will I sign any deal with a publisher that doesn&#8217;t retain my autonomy and give me control over cover design, layout, input on promotion, etc. As I wrote on Redroom: I&#8217;d rather starve in a garret than sell out like a whore and live in a mansion. I&#8217;ve walked away from a movie deal, anthology appearances, publishers and agents because they failed to meet my terms. &#8220;Integrity&#8221; isn&#8217;t the brand name of a shampoo, it&#8217;s fundamental to my approach to my work, my ART&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
