<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How much traffic will a prominent link on Huffington Post bring?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggasm.com/how-much-traffic-will-a-prominent-link-on-huffington-post-bring/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-much-traffic-will-a-prominent-link-on-huffington-post-bring</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Libby Brittain</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-much-traffic-will-a-prominent-link-on-huffington-post-bring/comment-page-1#comment-84522</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby Brittain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=3422#comment-84522</guid>
		<description>Jeff -- True in the sense that they are aggregators, since apparently newspapers have lost the curatorial abilities to do this for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8212; True in the sense that they are aggregators, since apparently newspapers have lost the curatorial abilities to do this for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-much-traffic-will-a-prominent-link-on-huffington-post-bring/comment-page-1#comment-84395</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=3422#comment-84395</guid>
		<description>One would have to think that without sites like  The Huffington Post and others, the papers site traffic would be even lower. These sites provides the &quot;we read it so you don&#039;t have to&quot; service to thin things out for us no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One would have to think that without sites like  The Huffington Post and others, the papers site traffic would be even lower. These sites provides the &#8220;we read it so you don&#8217;t have to&#8221; service to thin things out for us no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-much-traffic-will-a-prominent-link-on-huffington-post-bring/comment-page-1#comment-84352</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=3422#comment-84352</guid>
		<description>This goes to show that news outlets don&#039;t really need extra copyright protection.  Rather, as is typical in copyright industries... instead of innovating, Newpapers would like to use copyright as a way of protecting their old business models, and &quot;tax&quot; bloggers like Huffington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This goes to show that news outlets don&#8217;t really need extra copyright protection.  Rather, as is typical in copyright industries&#8230; instead of innovating, Newpapers would like to use copyright as a way of protecting their old business models, and &#8220;tax&#8221; bloggers like Huffington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Osborne</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-much-traffic-will-a-prominent-link-on-huffington-post-bring/comment-page-1#comment-84351</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=3422#comment-84351</guid>
		<description>Posner&#039;s brain is stuck in the business models of industrialized print and mass broadcasting. I would KILL to have the prominent linking AP and NYT stories get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posner&#8217;s brain is stuck in the business models of industrialized print and mass broadcasting. I would KILL to have the prominent linking AP and NYT stories get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ward</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-much-traffic-will-a-prominent-link-on-huffington-post-bring/comment-page-1#comment-84347</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=3422#comment-84347</guid>
		<description>&quot;So one link, 37,000 eyeballs.&quot;

Wouldn&#039;t it be more like 74,000 eyeballs?  Sorry, couldn&#039;t resist. ;)

Seriously, though, I&#039;d love to know how much traffic sites like Google News send, even while big media execs cry foul because those visitors don&#039;t hit their sites first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So one link, 37,000 eyeballs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be more like 74,000 eyeballs?  Sorry, couldn&#8217;t resist. <img src='http://bloggasm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, though, I&#8217;d love to know how much traffic sites like Google News send, even while big media execs cry foul because those visitors don&#8217;t hit their sites first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
