<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How difficult is it to scoop Boing Boing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggasm.com/how-difficult-is-it-to-scoop-boing-boing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-difficult-is-it-to-scoop-boing-boing</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-difficult-is-it-to-scoop-boing-boing/comment-page-1#comment-41748</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/how-difficult-is-it-to-scoop-boing-boing#comment-41748</guid>
		<description>I frequently outscoop Boing Boing on things. For me it was a matter of pride. Of course, it really isn&#039;t that big a deal, because BB can&#039;t cover EVERYTHING. Part of the problem is that the resulting popularity increases their focus and the need to cover anything. For my blog, I don&#039;t have to be current or topical or relevant except in narrow circumstances. 

BTW, I take pride in blogging about subjects never covered elsewhere (not on bb, digg, slashdot). By definition, if it has reached BB or Slashdot, the subject is already passe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frequently outscoop Boing Boing on things. For me it was a matter of pride. Of course, it really isn&#8217;t that big a deal, because BB can&#8217;t cover EVERYTHING. Part of the problem is that the resulting popularity increases their focus and the need to cover anything. For my blog, I don&#8217;t have to be current or topical or relevant except in narrow circumstances. </p>
<p>BTW, I take pride in blogging about subjects never covered elsewhere (not on bb, digg, slashdot). By definition, if it has reached BB or Slashdot, the subject is already passe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-difficult-is-it-to-scoop-boing-boing/comment-page-1#comment-41467</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/how-difficult-is-it-to-scoop-boing-boing#comment-41467</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d be interesting to know what percentage of links the authors actually &quot;find.&quot;  I&#039;d bet a very large percentage of links are either their own projects, or links recommended to them via the suggest a link feature.

I also suspect that what makes BB special isn&#039;t the external links it posts at all.  Rather, I think it&#039;s the unique content, like Cory&#039;s books, or anti-copyright screeds that make it a destination site.  The external links are just gravy.  As I noted recently, BB Gadgets has 1% of the reach of BB, which I think is attributable to the fact that BB Gadgets offers lots of links, but no special unique content.

I discussed BB Gadgets here:
http://superpunch.blogspot.com/2008/01/building-popular-site-is-tough-just.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be interesting to know what percentage of links the authors actually &#8220;find.&#8221;  I&#8217;d bet a very large percentage of links are either their own projects, or links recommended to them via the suggest a link feature.</p>
<p>I also suspect that what makes BB special isn&#8217;t the external links it posts at all.  Rather, I think it&#8217;s the unique content, like Cory&#8217;s books, or anti-copyright screeds that make it a destination site.  The external links are just gravy.  As I noted recently, BB Gadgets has 1% of the reach of BB, which I think is attributable to the fact that BB Gadgets offers lots of links, but no special unique content.</p>
<p>I discussed BB Gadgets here:<br />
<a href="http://superpunch.blogspot.com/2008/01/building-popular-site-is-tough-just.html" rel="nofollow">http://superpunch.blogspot.com/2008/01/building-popular-site-is-tough-just.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saskboy</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/how-difficult-is-it-to-scoop-boing-boing/comment-page-1#comment-41460</link>
		<dc:creator>Saskboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/how-difficult-is-it-to-scoop-boing-boing#comment-41460</guid>
		<description>It was an easy scoop that I had, since the blogger &quot;Daveberta&quot; is a member of a blogroll community I read regularly, www.ProgressiveBloggers.ca . He nabbed the domain name of a Premier, and grabbed headlines by publishing a legal threat made to him before Christmas, to &quot;return the persona&quot; of the Premier.

I prefer blogs with original content, to the ones with only links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was an easy scoop that I had, since the blogger &#8220;Daveberta&#8221; is a member of a blogroll community I read regularly, <a href="http://www.ProgressiveBloggers.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.ProgressiveBloggers.ca</a> . He nabbed the domain name of a Premier, and grabbed headlines by publishing a legal threat made to him before Christmas, to &#8220;return the persona&#8221; of the Premier.</p>
<p>I prefer blogs with original content, to the ones with only links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
