Comments on: Guess who’s not covering the McCain Burma lobbyist story? http://bloggasm.com/guess-whos-not-covering-the-mccain-burma-lobbyist-story Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:58:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Robert Nagle http://bloggasm.com/guess-whos-not-covering-the-mccain-burma-lobbyist-story/comment-page-1#comment-65267 Robert Nagle Mon, 12 May 2008 17:18:30 +0000 http://bloggasm.com/guess-whos-not-covering-the-mccain-burma-lobbyist-story#comment-65267 sorry, typo. Meant to say, "Ads for John Mccain are on the home page...is Google Ads really that dumb?" sorry, typo. Meant to say, “Ads for John Mccain are on the home page…is Google Ads really that dumb?”

]]> By: Robert Nagle http://bloggasm.com/guess-whos-not-covering-the-mccain-burma-lobbyist-story/comment-page-1#comment-65266 Robert Nagle Mon, 12 May 2008 17:17:38 +0000 http://bloggasm.com/guess-whos-not-covering-the-mccain-burma-lobbyist-story#comment-65266 Your blog is becoming surreal and hilarious! John McCain on the home page. oh, Google Ads really are dumb, aren't they? Your blog is becoming surreal and hilarious! John McCain on the home page. oh, Google Ads really are dumb, aren’t they?

]]> By: Robert Nagle http://bloggasm.com/guess-whos-not-covering-the-mccain-burma-lobbyist-story/comment-page-1#comment-65265 Robert Nagle Mon, 12 May 2008 17:10:52 +0000 http://bloggasm.com/guess-whos-not-covering-the-mccain-burma-lobbyist-story#comment-65265 This is totally bizzare. Google ads are displaying an Ann Coulter ad when I look at this. (Can you tell the difference between <a href="http://www.giveupblog.com/hitlercoulterquiz.html" rel="nofollow">her statements and that of Hitler </a>? (for the record, though, I clicked on the ad to give you that small revenue boost and to take it from her financial empire--there, justice!) I don't want to sound like I'm defending right-wingers. But why should they be obligated to cover this story? If you believe that the other side covers your own party too critically and its own party not critically enough, wouldn't the proper focus of your blog be to cover the blind spots of the other party? Their response would be: of course it's newsworthy that McCain has this affiliation. But we know the left-wing media will have a field day with that. What more do we have to add? Far more important is to report the scandals of Obama/Hilary/Michael Moore/Al Gore. This is totally bizzare. Google ads are displaying an Ann Coulter ad when I look at this. (Can you tell the difference between her statements and that of Hitler ? (for the record, though, I clicked on the ad to give you that small revenue boost and to take it from her financial empire–there, justice!)

I don’t want to sound like I’m defending right-wingers. But why should they be obligated to cover this story? If you believe that the other side covers your own party too critically and its own party not critically enough, wouldn’t the proper focus of your blog be to cover the blind spots of the other party?

Their response would be: of course it’s newsworthy that McCain has this affiliation. But we know the left-wing media will have a field day with that. What more do we have to add? Far more important is to report the scandals of Obama/Hilary/Michael Moore/Al Gore.

]]>