Archive for the 'film' Category

Garden State 2 aka The Last Kiss

Has anyone else seen the The Last Kiss trailer and immediately realized that Zach Braff is starring in what is essentially Garden State 2? Add to this the fact that it’s written by the same writers who wrote Crash, and we have a movie that’s bound to have characters walking around without personality and at the same time be incredibly heavy-handed. I smell Oscar.

Zach Braff

Big Man Tabasco Sauce lays it all out:

I recently saw the trailer for Zach Braff’s new film and was left shocked in my seat. The source of my surprise was that the title of the film was not “Garden State 2: The College Years,” but instead the near-meaningless “The Last Kiss.” The credits also informed me that it was penned by the same scribe that gave us “Crash,” aka the most ham-handed film ever inspired by liberal, white guilt, and “Million Dollar Baby.”

At first I thought that Braff must have collaborated on the script, but he has no credit listed. Which is odd, considering the film follows Zach Braff’s 10 Easy Tips for Writing Films About Twenty-Somethings® to the letter.

Follow the link and read his 10 easy steps, it’s brilliant.

Movie sales at theaters are on the rise while DVD sales are down

film reel
This is rather odd. It appears that (in Canada, at least), though theater ticket sales are up, DVD sales have actually decreased. Since one of the most-repeated lines towards movies that aren’t very good is “Wait till it comes out on DVD,” maybe this is a sign that the recent slew of film coming out of Hollywood has some quality to it:

Sales of pre-recorded videos are slowing, as Canadians show a greater interest in watching movies in a theatre rather than at home.

Statistics Canada says revenues from distributions to cinemas rose sharply in 2004/2005, while revenues from sales of DVDs and videocassettes levelled off after four years of growth.

Total film industry revenues climbed to more than $3.5 billion in 2004/2005, up 3.0 per cent from the previous year, and profit margins improved to 22.7 per cent from 21.8 per cent in 2003/2004.

A lot of people don’t know this, but DVD sales usually make up over half of a movie’s revenue. In fact, some movie companies were thinking about releasing DVDs simultaneously along with their theater counterparts. In theory, when the movie is in theaters it acts as a venue for word-of-mouth, which later helps DVD sales. I’m not sure what implications the slump in DVD sales holds for film.

Do you make music videos on your Macintosh?

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingFor those amateur film directors out there, here’s a chance to debut your music videos:

The Radar Festival is a music video festival that is open to filmmakers of all ages. To enter the competition, they must make a music video for a track drawn from a shortlist including the likes of Groove Armada and Franz Ferdinand. Entries must be created using Macs and Apple software, the deadline for entries is August 31.

I’ve been seeing a growing number of YouTube spoof music videos, and I know how frustrating it can be to break in as an aspiring director, this might be the chance for internet film geeks to cross over.

Related Posts: Terry Teachout talks about his experience writing a biography on Louis Armstrong, 21-year-old film student is the youngest to win World Series of Poker event, How word spreads about new kinds of music

21-year-old film student is the youngest to win World Series of Poker event

Back in my old poker days, my friends and I would fantasize what it’d be like to get ahold of the buy-in money to enter a major poker tournament. Well, one 21-year-old did: In one tournament he won $97,552, and the other he got first place and $660,948:

A 21-year-old film student from Los Angeles who dipped into a college fund and his parents’ wallets for his entry stakes has become the youngest player to win a World Series of Poker event.

Jeff Madsen, at 21 years, 1 month, 9 days old, outlasted 1,578 players in a three-day, $2,000 buy-in no-limit hold’em event, to earn $660,948 and his first World Series of Poker bracelet late Sunday night

The coolest thing about this whole win is the fact that he’s a film student. I really hope that he uses at least some of that money to put together an independent film. Darren Aronofsky would have killed for that amount of money back when he was struggling to make Pi.

Related posts: Comic Book purchases on the uprise, An open letter to the filmspotting hosts, Interview with the fat guy

Superman Returns: A Lesson in Mediocrity. Not even your theme song will save you

by Simon Owens

I had a romantic notion before going to see the ten o’clock showing of Superman Returns. We would go to the video store, rent the original Superman movie, and watch it, reveling in old Superman nostalgia from my childhood. Upon hearing this idea, my friend said, “Dude, the first Superman movie was terrible,” and then began to rattle off a number of points, most importantly the fact that in the original Superman, Lex Luthor had been cast as a silly, comedic character, unworthy as Superman’s nemesis.

He’d confirmed a number of my own suspicions that had begun to arise when I flipped to HBO one day and watched the second Superman movie, one that I had watched over and over again as a child while humming along to the now-famous orchestral theme song. The movie, I could see now, was complete and utter dogshit, but I had held out to the possibility that it had suffered from bad-sequel-syndrome, and that maybe the original was just as good as I remembered it to be.

Obviously, it wasn’t, so we skipped out on that idea and went to the theater without any Superman prep time, ready to discard the previous Superman movies from our minds and view this new, 21st-century, post 9/11 (for some reason, movie critics like to use the words “post 9/11″ when talking about epic movies, so I’ll follow in line) interpretation of it.

Only, from the very beginning the audience immediately begins to see references from the original movie. Indeed, the opening credits are almost exact replicates of the 80s-style blue retro laser credits used before. And throughout the movie, the plot is littered with smirking winks to not only the original movies, but the old television show and comic books as well (It’s a bird, it’s a plane, etc…), in what adds up to a movie that is perhaps too much a homage to the Superman franchise as a whole rather than the Man of Steel himself.

The movie picks up somewhat from the series, when Superman (Brandon Routh) returns to Earth after being gone for five years in search of left-over remnants of Krypton (as a result of scientists claiming they’d found the planet). He tries to pick up his life where he left off, but predictably, he comes to find that the world has moved on without Superman. Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth) has a kid and is now engaged with the editor’s nephew. She’s also now a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist for an editorial titled “Why The World Doesn’t Need Superman.” The Daily Planet seems to have gotten along fine without his investigative reporting, and Clark Kent is met with lukewarm sentiment from everyone at the paper except Jimmy Olsen (Sam Huntington) who couldn’t be happier to see him.

Meanwhile, Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey) has managed to get out of prison because of a silly, implausible legal loophole that had to do with Superman not being there as a witness for his appeal (is it just me, or does the central theme to this story add up to: “Superman shouldn’t leave the planet for long periods of time”?), and is back to his scheming ways. He treks up to the Fortress of Sollitude to trick Jor-El’s (Marlon Brando) pre-recorded ghost into telling him all the secrets of Krypton, allowing him to have technology much more advanced than that of the rest of the human race. His grand scheme is to drown out most of the continents with crystal continents of his own (using Kryptonian technology that apparently just involves dipping crystal in water), and then sell the land for vast sums of money. Because Superman is such a God-like character and almost impossible to stop, of course he has to find some Kryptonite along the way so he can have his typical scene where he is able to best Superman.

Like the Batman Begins movie, this one suffers from an overly-convoluted scheme that we’re not really able to wrap our minds around, despite the fact that we’ve turned our brains off at the very beginning (as anyone should during a comic book movie). After we find out that Lex Luthor has gathered technology thousands of years ahead of our time and we begin to consider all the cool things he could do with it, he decides to…grow masses of ugly, barren land so he can sell beach-front property?

Kevin Spacey, though much better as Lex Luthor than Gene Hackman’s comedic portrayal, still isn’t quite able to capture the pure genius that we’ve come to expect of the character. He adds some interesting crazy psychosis to the mix, and comes off as slightly darker, but director Bryan Singer can’t quite give up the old Lex Luthor – the one who thinks it prudent to lighten the atmosphere with a corny joke every few minutes. Kate Bosworth makes for a terrible Lois Lane because we’re never able to really like her throughout the entire thing – in fact she plays a self-absorbed bitch. Though there seems to be a few sparks between her and Superman, she treats Clark Kent like an irrelevant piece of shit (or a child, even), and ignores everything said by anyone that doesn’t add up to her getting her way. Jimmy Olsen is his usual gee-golly self, and Perry White’s (Frank Langella) character is too much a rip-off of Spiderman’s arrogant J. Jonah Jameson. And like most super hero movies of late, the movie rushes through scenes that should be longer, and gives us prolonged stare-into-each-others-eyes scenes when we wish it would speed up.

This is not to say that there aren’t successes in this movie. Most of the action scenes are terrific – when Superman zooms through the clouds in his red and blue, there is something uniquely American about the entire thing, and there are certainly things that Bryan Singer borrowed from the original movies which were welcome, especially the old orchestral theme song. As the movie nears its end, we grow slightly more convinced at the connection between Lois Lane and Superman, especially in the scene where he flies her off the rooftop for a night-time air-stroll through the city. Lex Luthor’s hatred for Superman is more fully-realized, and though the dialog is corny at times, it’s several steps above the drudge that was Xmen 3.

Superman isn’t necessarily a bad movie, it’s just a mediocre one. When a fan-base is forced to wait years in between one sequel and the next, expectations begin to rise. Add to the fact that this particular sequel has had a very long and bumpy ride (read that, it’ll make you laugh and cry and cringe), then one can understand the disappointment that arises when movies like Batman Begins and Superman Returns have the plots of half-hour television shows, rather than epic movies. If you want us to love a super hero movie, give the villain some real ammo, something more than just the desire to sell shitty beach-front property, and perhaps you won’t hear us say “We waited almost twenty years for that?” when the credits begin to roll.

Related posts: Comic book purchases are on the uprise, Thank You for Smoking: If only lobbyists had it so good, Interview with JaPundit

Copyright hurdles for documentarians

This is nothing I really stopped to consider before. I knew that film-makers who make fictional films have to run the copyright loops from a variety of venues, considering that they’re dealing with things like ad-placement, movie-albums, etc…, but never did I realize that documentarians have to go through these same hurdles. There’s something about this that just makes you want to scream; the fact that those who have enlisted themselves to record history for us in visual form aren’t completely protected by fair-use laws. There’s a Wired article that interviews law professors who wrote a comic book about this subject: Battling the Copyright Monster.

At one point, it begins talking about how copyright has changed over the last 80 years, and how it has actually become an us-versus-them mentality for film-makers:

A fourth thing that cuts the other way is the fear-and-loathing syndrome. There’s a whole generation of filmmakers and digital creators whose only experience of copyright is as a hassle, as an obstruction, as a cease-and-desist letter preventing them from making or distributing their work. They see copyright as a pointless labyrinth they have to make their way through to make their art. We actually view ourselves as copyright defenders, showing how copyright is supposed to work. We’re saying this imbalance could cause us to lose the next generation of artists, if they think of copyright as worthless.

But perhaps the most shocking paragraph in the whole interview was this one:

First of all, documentaries are incredibly important records of our history and culture. They’re visual histories, and they’re increasingly based on copyrighted culture. Our book describes several instances in which the telling of that history has been thwarted by permissions issues. An example is Jon Else having to pay $10,000 for a four-and-a-half-second clip of The Simpsons playing in the background of his film (Sing Faster: The Stagehands’ Ring Cycle). The makers of Mad Hot Ballroom had to pay that same amount to EMI because a cell phone rings in the background of one of the scenes, and the ringtone is the theme from Rocky. These examples really resonate with people. They understand that these are instances where copyright is not working the way it’s supposed to.

A massive amount of money for a Rocky ringtone that went off somewhere in the background? For a documentary? Something that usually isn’t expected to make much money anyway?

via IFC

Related posts: Netflix is getting distribution rights to indie movies, Supersize Me filmmaker makes fun of retarded people,

An Open Letter to the Filmspotting hosts

Upon learning from the hosts of the podcast Filmspotting that they were going to switch from two shows a week to one show a week, I wrote them this letter:

Adam and Sam,

First, let me give you a little background about my history with Filmspotting: Shortly after I bought my Ipod, I logged onto Itunes and started subscribing to podcasts that I thought I’d be interested in. I randomly came across the Filmspotting one and downloaded it, not realizing that upon listening, I would become instantly hooked and never miss a single episode from then forward. I usually go on long walks (sometimes 2 hours of walking a day) and this is when I listen to all my podcasts and audio books.

When you guys made your big announcement, I was walking down a long wood trail, and as soon as I heard you say that you were going to only one show a week, I came to a dead stop and let out a very audible groan. I couldn’t help but notice that the old couple who were walking their dog and passing me at that very moment gave each other a look in which both realized simultaneously that they were alone in the woods with what could very well be a complete psycho. Lucky for them, I wasn’t a psycho, just a diehard fan bemoaning such a saddening announcement.

So I set out to go home and write you a long, flowery email that would convince you beyond a doubt that you should stick to two shows a week. The only thing was: I didn’t know what to say. I was at a loss for words. Here I was, a person with a degree in English, and I couldn’t even write the masterpiece to top all masterpieces: an email that would convince you guys to continue posting two shows a week. So instead of writing you that email, I wrote this letter, which I will be sending to Shippensburg University, from which I graduated:

***

To Whom This May Concern,

Enclosed in this envelope you will find my college diploma, which I am returning to you for your disposal. I was enrolled in Shippensburg University from 2002 to 2006, and in those four years I’ve managed to gather a whole world of knowledge while developing a writing skill that would allow me to go on and sell my work to dozens of magazines and anthologies. In your English classes, I was able to analyze and discus all the great works of literature, and by the time I was finished those four years, I came out convinced that I was prepared for the real world.

Imagine my surprise, then, when the two hosts of one of my favorite shows announced that they were going to switch to only one show a week, and I lacked the complete eloquence needed in order to convince them otherwise. I felt betrayed by your university, that I had lived a lie, that the diploma hanging on that wall was a sham, an undeserved trophy that held no honor attached to it.

Hence why I must return the diploma to you, to not only overcome my own shame, but to let you know that you have failed one of your students in your plight to spread knowledge to better the world around us.

Sincerely yours,
Simon David Owens

Ps. I don’t suppose I can get a $40,000 refund as well?

***

So there you have it, Adam and Sam. I guess the only thing I have to say is that I would really like to not have to send that letter. Those were four long years, and I’d hate to see that they went to waste. Is there any kindness in your hearts so that you can allow a college graduate remain a college graduate, so that he can go on to remain successful and confident for the rest of his life?

Thank you ever so much for taking this into consideration.

Your fan,
Simon Owens


Blog Widget by LinkWithin