Archive for the 'feminism' Category

Some Tuesday links

Anybody who has spent considerable time on the internet knows that one downside to online life is how easy it is to get caught up reading (and possibly participating in) an internet flame war. What’s most frustrating about this tendency is the fact that once you snap out of it and force yourself to stop, you come to this self-realization that you’ve just completely wasted an hour of your life performing an utterly inconsequential task. Despite the fact that you’ve spent the entire time reading, you haven’t learned anything new and chances are you’ve managed to get yourself annoyed with anonymous people, most of whom never even bothered giving their real names.

So the reason I’m telling you all this is because that’s my excuse for why I have so few links for you today. So here are (a small number) of media-related links for your amusement.

1. This year’s Pulitzers have been announced. Given that these link lists always result in me having to post news a day or two late and just about every media blog out there has already reported this news, I’m boring myself right now just by linking to it. Okay okay, here’s a link to Gawker trashing the Pulitzers and calling them worthless. You didn’t think I’d let you leave without a little red meat, did you?

2. Now here’s the real news. It turns out that the Huffington Post has surpassed The Drudge Report in unique visitors. I have long despised Drudge, not for his politics but because I could never for the life of me understand why he became so popular. He had an absolutely ugly site and most of the links he posts are to mainstream news sources. I could easily do his job for him by just subscribing to the RSS feeds of all the major news sites. Every now and then he publishes his own scoop, but they’re usually factually inaccurate and relatively rare. In fact, the only time I ever visited his website was when I was reading some news feature about how Drudge rules our world. Then I almost had to visit the site just to confirm, in my head, “You mean that Drudge?”

3. A new study released recently shows that news readers and newspaper editors widely disagree on how comments should be moderated on news websites. It brings up the good point that if editors are expected to avoid anonymous sources unless absolutely necessary, then anonymous commenting should be similarly shunned. I’m not necessarily against anonymous commenting, but I rarely, if ever, engage in it myself.

4. Will Feminism and porn ever be compatible? I explored this issue a long time ago over here. I think the problem with trying to remain PC when making porn is the fact that a lot of sexual turn-ons are non-PC. I’m not an expert on sexual theory, but I would think there’s some (dark) correlation between what is forbidden and what turns us on. This provides a dilemma for pornographers.

Interview with Echidne of the Snakes

Echidne of the Snakes has been blogging since late 2003, her very first post exclaiming that “[i]t is the time for darkness. Today’s blog will reflect that.” Though the blog has a feminist theme, it often expounds on more general political topics. Echidne describes herself as a “minor greek goddess,” and her name is presumably derived from Echidna, a mytholigical figure depicted as a “she viper.”

Bloggasm interviewed her previously in early 2006.

Simon Owens: With the prospect of Hilary Clinton receiving the Democratic nomination, how will this affect feminist discussion over the next two years? Do you think Republican attackers will try to tread lightly over the subject of Clinton’s gender, or do you think this will be the most politically incorrect election we’ve had in years?

Echidne: It has already affected feminist discussion, because some feminists have publicly come out in support of another candidate, which in this case means a male candidate, given the scarcity of women in politics. As I see it the conflict is between wanting a more representative system of government, one with more women in it, and between wanting certain political stances (such as getting out of Iraq quickly) respected.

I don’t think Republican attackers would tread lightly on anything that could help them. The form those attackers will take depends on the calculations they make inside their heads. For instance, how much would misogyny gain them and how much would it lose them?

By the way, “politically incorrect” is a paradoxical term to use, because what is really “politically correct” is to be whatever the people in power want you to be, and feminists are not in power. The whole term smells of Luntzian thought pretzeling.

Simon Owens: You’ve responded to Ann Althouse’s anti-feminist statements numerous times. Several bloggers have noted that Althouse is the only person who considers herself a feminist. Do you think that “feminist” has become such a mainstream word that it’s starting to lose its meaning, to the point where people like Althouse can continually claim they fall under that label?

Echidne: Not numerous times. I’ve talked about some of Althouse’s posts and articles, but only two or three of them. I don’t think Althouse thinks of herself as the only feminist alive (that would be me), but I’ve pointed out that she appears to believe that the dirty work of feminism belongs to someone else.

As to the meaning of the term “feminism”, I think that many startlingly new proposals of the second wave of feminism are now mainstream and fairly accepted, but that the term “feminism” itself has been smeared and turned into something quite nasty-smelling by Rush Limbaugh and the like, to such an extent that to say that one is a feminist (i.e., a believer of equal opportunities for women and men and a believer in the equal valuation of traditionally male and female spheres of activities) reads to many as saying that one hates men. So the term itself didn’t get mainstreamed, even though some of its ideas did.

Simon Owens: In our last interview, you described Pandagon as a blog that deals largely with feminist issues. How did the recent witch hunt the conservatives conducted on Amanda Marcotte affect you?

Echidne: It didn’t affect me personally, but I wrote on some of things that William Donohue has done in the past and the sort of access he has in the mainstream media, access, which nobody from the liberal/progressive blogosphere can even dream about. It is not a fair fight at all, and Amanda got attacked by it. Anyone writing about feminism knows that keeping women in their traditional places is an important subtext in much of today’s wingnuttery. Sadly.

Simon Owens: What’s your policy on deleting comments from feminist-hating trolls? How many do you get on a weekly basis? Do you find that they increase whenever a conservative blogger links to you?

Echidne: I try not to delete comments if there is anything factual or debatable in them, and sometimes I leave a comment even if it doesn’t satisfy this rule if it tells us something more about the anti-feminists.

The weekly dirtload varies and is affected by what I post and by the links to them. But I’m a fairly mild-mannered goddess and so get spared the very nastiest kinds of trolls.

Simon Owens: Have your thoughts on feminism evolved since you started your blog back in 2003? Has there been any major changes in the feminist movement since then?

Echidne: My thoughts are always changing but not the basic platform from which my feminism grew. I pay more attention to the rest of the world now that the Internet offers me so much more information. I’m also much more aware of and informed about the anti-woman and anti-feminist sentiment out there, and better equipped to argue the claims attached to it.

I think that the feminist movement has changed since 2003, although I’m not sure if the changes are major or not yet. There is a greater openness to different discussions, many more young women writing and working in the area and a feeling of something being born. My guess is that we are in the fermenting stage right now. What will come out of it is interesting to witness.

***

(Related posts: Why I love Glenn Greenwald, The untouchable is now touchable: Abstinence-only education being pushed towards medical students)

Mapping the Diversity of the Blogosphere: A Bloggasm Case Study

Premise: After reading a Newsweek article that discussed the lack of diversity in the blogosphere, I instantly became fascinated with the discussion of how the semi-anonymous blogosphere’s diversity compares to the diversity of traditional media. When talking about this Newsweek article, several bloggers pointed out that in many cases, you don’t know the race or gender of a blogger, which theoretically means that there is a somewhat-even playing field based on quality of content alone. But I was surprised that not much was done to actually chart the diversity of the blogosphere to create a frame of reference for these diversity dicussions to take place. So I set out to not only map the diversity of the blogosphere as a whole, but to also map diversity within individual niches.

Methods of experimentation: I emailed 1,000 (of which 302 responded) different bloggers with a 4-question survey that enabled me to statistically chart the diversity of both gender and race within each niche. The 4 questions were:

1. What niche does your blog fall into (Examples: Political, gadget, movie, etc…If more than one, please list)?

2. What are the genders of all the bloggers who write for your site?

3. What are the races for all the bloggers who write for your site (if there are any that you’re not sure about, just indicate that you don’t know)?

4. What do you think of the diversity of the blogosphere, both in your niche and as a whole?

I sent these surveys out over a period of several weeks and waited for them to accumulate in my inbox. After I had a representative sample from each niche, I tallied the results and then added them up.

Results: Obviously, defining race is a tricky subject, and every time someone tries to pin down a racial category, someone else can easily come up with a scenario in which this category doesn’t work. So I try to be as broad as possible in my racial categories, with the realization that no matter how hard I try, there will still be criticism as to how the races were labeled.

The Blogosphere as a whole: These are the results if you add all the niches together:

Male: 69%
Female: 31%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 73%
Black/African: 9%
Asian: 10%
Middle Eastern/Arab: 1%
Latino/Hispanic: 6%
Native American: 1%

Comics Blogs:

Male: 71%
Female: 29%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 85%
Black/African: 4%
Asian: 7%
Latino/Hispanic: 4%

Sex Blogs:

Male: 36%
Female: 64%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 100%

Gadget/Technology Blogs:

Male: 67%
Female: 33%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 29%
Asian: 43%
Latino/Hispanic: 28%

Gay/Homosexual Blogs:

Male: 94%
Female: 6%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 88%
Black/African: 6%
Asian: 6%

Movie/Film/Television Blogs:

Male: 81%
Female: 19%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 68%
Black/African: 8%
Asian: 12%
Latino/Hispanic: 12%

Sports Blogs:

Male: 86%
Female: 14%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 68%
Black/African: 5%
Asian: 27%

Law/Legal Blogs:

Male: 74%
Female: 26%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 94%
Latino/Hispanic: 6%

Music Blogs:

Male: 71%
Female: 29%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 80%
Black/African: 20%

Speculative Fiction (Science Fiction, Fantasy, Horror) Blogs:

Male: 72%
Female: 28%
***
Caucasian: 89%
Black/African: 2%
Asian: 9%

Gossip/Fashion Blogs:

Male: 29%
Female: 71%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 48%
Black/African: 30%
Asian: 9%
Latino/Hispanic: 9%
Native American: 4%

Liberal Political Blogs:

Male: 67%
Female: 33%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 84%
Black/African: 5%
Asian: 8%
Native American: 3%

Conservative Political Blogs:

Male: 79%
Female: 21%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 87%
Black/African: 4%
Asian: 2%
Middle Eastern/Arab: 2%
Latino/Hispanic: 3%
Native American: 2%

Regional/City/Location-oriented Blogs:

Male: 57%
Female: 43%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 86%
Asian: 14%

Military Blogs:

Male: 76%
Female: 24%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 100%

Feminist Blogs:

Male: 14%
Female: 86%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 50%
Black/African: 38%
Latino/Hispanic: 12%

Food Blogs:

Male: 24%
Female: 76%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 94%
Asian: 6%

Literary/Book Blogs:

Male: 65%
Female: 35%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 76%
Black/African: 6%
Middle Eastern/Arab: 12%
Latino/Hispanic: 6%

Poker Blogs:

Male: 86%
Female: 14%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 88%
Latino/Hispanic: 12%

Wine Blogs:

Male: 66%
Female: 34%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 100%

Science Blogs:

Male: 71%
Female: 29%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 88%
Black/African: 6%
Asian: 6%

Automotive/Car/Truck/Motorcycle Blogs:

Males: 90%
Females: 10%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 78%
Asian: 11%
Lation/Hispanic: 11%

Interesting Observations:

1. Many of the bloggers felt inclined to include their religion for the race question. For instance, there were a lot of Jewish bloggers, and in the US they would be considered a minority group. Perhaps I should have been more broad in my survey and asked which ethnic group a blogger belonged to.

2. There were a few bloggers who grew defensive about the race question. They would answer “American” or that they were part of “The Human Race.” One blogger posted my survey on his blog where it was ridiculed by several readers for exactly this reason.

3. Several bloggers noted that they didn’t really know much about the diversity of their niche because they couldn’t see the faces of most of the bloggers (excluding ones who include pics).

Conclusions:

1. You can compare the demographics of the blogosphere to the demographics of the US through the 2000 US Census (PDF). Please note however that a couple of the blogs included in my survey aren’t written by US citizens.

For gender:

Male: 49.1%
Female: 50.9%

For race (please note that the Census places Hispanics as Caucasian):

White: 75.1%
Black or African American: 12.3%
American Indian and Alaska Native: 0.9%
Asian: 3.6%

2. You can compare the demographics of computer owners who have access to internet to my results through this Census report (PDF). As you can see, there seems to be a correlation between those who have access to internet and those who have blogs. The chart shows that a higher percentage of Asians have access to internet than blacks, and this could be why more Asians blog despite the fact that they make up a smaller US percentage than blacks.

3. The only niches where females outnumbered males were Sex Blogs, Gossip/Fashion Blogs, Feminist Blogs, and Food Blogs.

4. White males make up the largest group within the blogosphere as a whole.

Flaws in the experiment: Oh, there are many. To list:

1. This was not a scientific poll, and should not be regarded as such. It gives a very rough idea about blogosphere diversity. It really all came down to who actually responded to the survey. In order for there to be a more accurate picture of the blogosphere, more studies by professional pollsters would have to be conducted.

2. As always with my Bloggasm Case Studies, I would have liked to have a larger sample.

3. This really only maps the diversity of niche bloggers. It doesn’t take into account the millions of livejournal, xanga, and myspace blogs out there. If I were to survey people who just keep a blog for personal journals, then the results might have turned out differently.

4. There are probably several more. I’d like people to write in with their criticisms of this study so that I can have a follow-up post in a few days that will publish some of the things you have to say. Please be civil in your emails. Remember that I didn’t do this study to personally offend anyone. You can send these emails to simon.bloggasm@gmail.com

The Blogosphere Speaks out: For my fourth question, I asked what the bloggers thought about diversity within their niche and in the blogosphere as a whole. Here’s a small sample of the responses I got:

1. John Scalzi: I assume the diversity of the blog world maps to the diversity of college-educated adults, since in my experience (and leaving aside MySpace and Facebook for the moment), college-educated adults are the people most likely to blog. Whether this is sufficient diversity is up to other people to argue about. I will say that given the current low barrier of entry to blogging (i.e., all you need is an internet connection), there’s no reason the blogosphere couldn’t be profoundly diverse.

2.Jeff Soyer:While most of the high profile bloggers are white males, it doesn’t take long to discover that there are huge quantities of bloggers of every interest, race, gender, religion, and political persuasion. There are whole groups of black bloggers, gay bloggers, tons of women bloggers. There are bloggers about every niche subject under the sun. The other day I wrote a short post about switching browsers, from Safari to Firefox. A blog dedicated to news about Macs gave a link and sent 400 readers my way! There are bloggers for pets, cooking, sci-fi, local state politics, travel, there was even one from a research scientist in Antarctica posting pictures every few days. There are homeless bloggers using the computers in libraries or cafes.

These days, almost everyone has access to a computer and with so many sites willing to host blogs for free, anyone can get their opinions onto the web. I consider the blogosphere to be the most democratic of institutions in that anyone can have a blog and — since most blogs accept comments — anyone can respond to blog posts. This is where Main Stream Media can never hope to compete because they have limited “letters to the editor” space as well as censoring rights. Needless to say, TV news opinions almost always go unanswered, too — except via the blogosphere.

3.Chuck Dupree: I’m starting from the viewpoint that everything I know about the web—and I’ve been using the internet since 1979; I was building SGML processing software in 1980—relates either to the US or to cyberspace in general. When we talk about how ‘representative the blogosphere is, that’s a relative term. I can only compare to what I know.

My other starting point is that I basically don’t give a crap about the non-political blogosphere. My guess is that no matter how you define the word, most of the blogosphere is not about politics and the related civic, social, religious, and literary issues I care about. Probably most definitions of “blogosphere” would assign a miniscule proportion to the political. I’m happy that people are finding this new communication medium useful for non-political purposes; but I don’t care about sewing or CB radio or teenage angst or other peoples’ videos of themselves, so I don’t visit those parts of the ’sphere and I thus have little to no idea what they’re like. I’m only talking about the part I inhabit.

In that context, it seems to me that the blogosphere’s diversity leaves a lot to be desired.

The blogosphere is certainly more diverse with respect to political opinion than the mainstream media. In fact I’d claim that we represent the range of opinion in the US fairly well. I have no way to measure how representative bloggers outside the US are of their neighbors.

I think the blogosphere has made significant strides with respect to gender diversity in the last year or so. There are a lot more well-known female bloggers than there were when I started, which is obviously a fine thing. I think there are some male bloggers who did their bit by linking to and promoting the better blogs from women. But mostly I think that there aren’t as many female nerds as male nerds, and it wasn’t until people began to think of the internet as communication rather than computing that women got turned on by the possibilities. Now that everyone realizes it’s about communication, women have begun to take their rightful place in the medium.

As far as racial diversity goes, one of the cool things about the web is that you generally don’t know what race, religion, or gender your commentors and correspondents are. You take them on their ideas and their words. But to judge from the data one sees in the news, we need to do more to make sure that the worst off, who in the US are disproportionally black and Hispanic, have easy access to the internet. A society full of literate people is a better society for all except the top couple of percent. Our society is not currently set up to encourage movement up the economic ladder, but in my opinion it will either become more encouraging of such movement or it will face gradually increasing civil revolt.

In a society that allows people to move from the lower class to the middle, education is key; and for upcoming generations, understanding computers will be part of what it means to be literate. Thus we must make familiarity with the internet easy to gain for everyone. It’s possible that the Negroponte laptop will allow significant strides in this area. In any case it’s a worthy attempt, and if it fails we should try to figure out why and make an improved model. The goal is vital.

4. Pinko Feminist Hellcat: I think the blogosphere as a whole and feminist blogs in particular are pretty diverse. However, (you knew that was coming, didn’t you?) people still tend to link to and give credence to folks who ‘look’ like them. So, for example, you’ll see White feminists shutting down and shutting out women of color like Nubian, Shannon, and Brownfemipower. There is a lot of defensiveness about discussions about race, class, ablility, or sexuality. People tend to feel threatened when we’re called out on something, and a lot of us have the mistaken view that because we’re leftists or feminists or whatever, that we’re above all of that.

5. Greasy Guide: I think diversity for the blogosphere is good. But for the urban bloggers or bloggers who focus on Hip-Hop and Black Lifestyles it’s hard for us to make real money. While there are communities out there like Gawker…there is no organization which unites urban bloggers together and helps them make money or get access to items for stories. So while it’s good to see a huge number of sites that are diverse, we are not making the money that the mainstream blogs are.

6. Edward Champion: I think the literary blogosphere is a little different from other niches. There are a lot of women out there who blog. Laila Lalami and Tayari Jones are two bloggers (also accomplished writers in their own right) who often bring interesting cultural perspectives into their blogs, and I read them both every day.

The blogosphere as a whole, however, seems the province of mostly white males — particularly on the politics and technology side.

7. ADD: The blogosphere, and especially the comics blogosphere, seems diverse to me, but I seek out as many opinions and angles as I can in my quest for a better understanding of the artform of comics. While owning a computer and an internet connection are, I suppose, barriers to complete freedom to blog, once you’re online the only determining factor to getting your voice consistently heard is what you have to say, and how well you say it. I don’t personally care what race, gender or sexual orientation you are — if you have something to teach me, I am willing to listen. I’d like to think quality writing is the great equalizer: My favourite comics blogger of all time is gay, but it seems ridiculous to even say that. He’s just my favourite comics blogger of all time, and I’m glad he’s back.

8. Golden State of Mind (Atma Brother #1): Right now the hoops and more generally sports media is primarily dominated by white middle-aged men (the Bay Area being a welcome exception). The hoops blogosphere affords new opportunities for people that have been excluded from having a voice to share their unique perspectives. NBA blogs in particular are growing at a rapid pace and with that growth a diverse array of fresh ideas and thoughts from both people of color and women have emerged. Traditional hoops coverage better watch out! In a year or two the hoops blogosphere and subculture is really going to explode.

As for the blogosphere as a whole- there’s more flavors than Baskin Robbins could ever feature! The diversity and niche interests represented are impressive. You have to do a little work to find them, but there are blogs for anything you can imagine that connect to people at a very personal level. Are you a South Asian American who loves Bay Area hip hop, sports, and nerdy gadgets? There are exactly zero TV shows for you, but there’s tons of blogs just for you. Just poke around.

Current media giants have been incredibly slow to respect and fully understand diversity, mostly because they are often times so detached from the people they want to reach. Blogs on the other hand (not counting the fake corporate ones) are inherently community-based and are created for the people by the people.

9. Secret Simon: I can only speculate, but on the whole, blogging can be anything from a glorified personals ad to an introspective essay on the state of the universe and all shades in between. But since most have facets of reader interaction, even ones that are anonymously penned, blogs become a giant social network and include at least a diverse readership, if not participation.

Something I’ve observed in niches is that they tend to link each other sometimes exclusively, for instance, the gay bloggers tend to communicate and comment and read other gay bloggers, the art bloggers seek out other art blogs, mommy bloggers keep to their inner circle of fellow moms. Because of the shared interest and what they are comfortable with it’s hard to find an overlapping diversity because you run into the same people over and over. It’s there but doesn’t spread easily. People fall into their niche, just as they would seek out a social group, often times filling a void if that social group is physically unavailable.

It is pretty basic though, that people who read and write blogs must have access to the technology, and while that is pretty easy worldwide now, there is a section of Earth’s population that will always have no idea what a “blog” is. As such it tends to fall to the countries or communities with the personal computers and internet connection.

If I may add I’m more accustomed to seeking out personal, journal style blogs and rarely read bigger ones that are collective. Also while I am sure there are those whose intentions are less than honorable and one must be careful, I have not had any negative experience in the blogosphere with the those I have interacted with.

10. Cork and Demon: The blogosphere seems quite diverse to me, both in niche interests and gender/race. I have seen and read blogs by people of Asian, African, Middle Eastern and European decent, although I don’t recall having read one written by or about those of Hispanic descent. I see lots of blogs written by women, men, teenagers and younger kids.

As for the niche of food and wine, I see plenty of women writing food related blogs, particularly sharing recipes and at-home food experiences, many of whom have a particular subject, such as desserts, or even more specific, such as cupcakes. Women also review restaurants, offer tips on making beverages and wine pairings, and discuss the foodie culture.

The niche of wine talk is dominated by caucasian men, as far as I can see, with a range in age of about 25-60. There are a few women, including myself, but I have never felt that I am dismissed because of my gender in any way. I just think that the wineblogging community reflects the wine interest niche as a whole, and women have typically shyed away from it.

11. Green LA Girl: I have to agree with Gregory Dicum, who says many big green bloggers are highly educated males. So I do wish we had both more women and more people of color blogging on sustainability. Or more accurately, there ARE lots of women and people of color blogging about these issues, but their blogs tend not to be very popular as they tend to be more personal blogs from people who don’t already have a big name due to their affiliation with work or with an enviro org.

I guess I’m saying that the high percentage of white males heading up various big enviro orgs and businesses tends to translate into a high percentage of while males heading up big enviro blogs. This is hardly a situation that’s unique to the environmental movement, of course, but one that we environmentalists could keep working to address. On the upside, these highly educated male enviro bloggers I mentioned tend to be dudes that care deeply about environmental and social justice, so I’m optimistic that they too are concerned about issues of diversity.

12. Manhattan Offender: The honest answer is that I am so within my own niche that I don’t have a real awareness of other bloggers outside of the “gay” or “humor” genres. And while there may be diversity within those niches, for the most part, those I have encountered have been white, college educated people. Even within that niche I sort of stand out as having come from a blue-collar background and age-wise, I’m an “older” blogger.

I’ve tried to transcend the niche to a degree. Mine is one of the few sites of “GWM” bloggers that links to sites written in Spanish, Portuguese, and even Turkish. While it seems that many bloggers are out to find people of “like-mind”, I think I have enough of that in the “real” world. My experience with blogging has been to search out sites that have diverse viewpoints in politics and other perspectives. (The exception is religion. Religion is for suckers.)

There were predictions written years ago that as the diversity of available media increased, there would be an equivalent increase in partisanship or “niche-ism”. While these predictions have come true in the infant and toddler years of the internet, it would be my guess that readers will eventually grow bored of reading the same viewpoints within their niche. In time, we will part of the tools available for those reaching out for a diversity of viewpoints in order to formulate opinions of their own.

13. Freya’s House of Dreams: Diversity? As in the cultural or racial differences or overall diversity of race, class, gender, quality of perspective?

The first one would be hard to answer. It’s the internet, people can say they’re anything they want to be. So while someone might say they were an Asian woman but be an old white guy living in his mom’s basement in Philly. It seems that there are more white bloggers of middle class out there but I can’t say for sure. I’d wager it was true given the way class works in American culture (I don’t see a whole lot of blogs from other countries but that may be because I can’t read in other languages).

Who has computers? Who has enough spare time to blog? Single mothers working two jobs to pay the rent don’t have the time. Guys on swing shift trying to make the mortgage and keep the family eating and with health insurance don’t have the time. The blogsphere has a great scarcity of perspectives from blue collar/working class people.

As for the second issue - IMO this is also colored by the relative ease with which people can masquerade as just about anyone online. However, I don’t see a whole lot of blue collar sex blogs, nor do I see many sex blogs I’d consider to offer truly good writing or interesting perspectives. In that sense, most sex blogs are at best boring and homogenous and at worst, awful drek.

14. Sexoteric: Well, there’s both a lot of variety and a lot of duplication. There’s a lot of sex blogs that aren’t much more than spam. And there are many blogs that liberally borrow content from each other, mine included. Most interesting are probably the people who write candidly about their actual experiences. Much good stuff there, of high quality. The best are for some reason usually women, with a few exceptions. Overall, I think there’s a lot of diversity in the blogosphere.

… But, wait, you’re thinking about diversity as in male/female, black/white, aren’t you? Not diversity of content? I personally think that’s a very U.S. - centric way of looking at it. You know, diversity being that the ratio of bloggers who are African-American should be the same as in the general population, etc. I don’t particularly buy that, and personally think that’s a bit of a racist/sexist attitude, to try to force particular ratios. Some kind of collective guilt thing from Amerca’s relatively recent past as a slave-holding nation.

There is no lack of bloggers who’re in minorities, and I think blogging provides excellent opportunities for any groups that otherwise might find it difficult to have a voice. An excellent equalizer.

15. Ben Peek: I think in my particular niche, there are too many writers, and not enough readers. It seems to be that these days if you’re a struggling author you go out and grab yourself a blog to help with your writing ‘career’, whatever such a thing is. Granted, it’s exactly how I began in 2001, but I did it simply because I couldn’t be bothered to create a dead web space site. I wanted something fluid.

Also, the bloggers are very white. This is especially the case of the Australian speculative fiction scene, which is, of course, largely white. The age range begins in the early twenties and goes out somewhere in the early to mid forties, from what I can tell. I can only think of one blogger over the age of fifty in the Australian speculative fiction scene.

So, I think the diversity could stand to be amped up a bit in the niches I find myself part of, but it’s not exactly like you can force a blog into the hands of someone just to change that. Over all, however, I do find the blogsphere to be a fairly diverse and interesting place.

16. Terra Sigillata: I am quite pleased with the diversity in my part of the blogosphere, especially at ScienceBlogs.com. Diversity of class or stature: we have a great mix of people across the scientific career spectrum, with basic scientists and physicians, as well as graduate students and fellows. Diversity of gender: we are almost 50/50 men and women, and the women are among the most reflective and constructive of the writers, raising the most critical questions and encouraging debate. Diversity of race: we could do better. We have a few brown-skinned folks, Bangledeshi, and “general” African-American, a few Asian-Americans (including one Canadian). I think that we could use some women of color and Hispanic-Americans of either sex.

In general, outside of ScienceBlogs.com, I am pleased to see so many feminist bloggers and female scientists, especially since one of my real-life career interests is increasing the number of women in science and medicine. Outside of blogging, medicine has done particularly well, although we have yet to see women significantly breaking into the upper eschelon of academic medicine administration (Donna Shalala as president of the Univ of Miami, notwithstanding). I was also tickled to see this year’s Lasker Award winners include two visionaries for their work on telomerase, Elizabeth Blackburn and her former student and now Hopkins professor, Carol Greider. The blogosphere clearly reflects this trend toward women helping women, even if it is not always present in academic science and medicine. I also see many mid-career men like me who blog are learning more about the real problems facing women in science and medicine that we may not necessarily hear in our daily academic lives. My hope is that the community that has developed in the blogosphere will come back and renew the sense of community and mentoring that seems to have been lost in the highly competitive real-world academic environment.

***

Did you enjoy this article? Go ahead and digg it

The irony of Ann Coulter in a nutshell

Campus Progress talks about an insanely silly post from TNR (so silly that I won’t even post a link to it) that asks this question: Should Ann Coulter be a feminist icon?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

We don’t have to read the article to know the answer: No. And indeed, it isn’t hard for CP to tear the logic to shreds. But I found a good snippet from one of the commenters in that post:

Coulter’s not a feminist icon; she’s a feminist irony.

Much like a rich entrepeneur who later attacks tax equality to allow other small businesses to succeed, or our good friend at YAF Jason Mattera who opposed Affirmative Action while receiving a minority scholarship, Coulter toes the conservative line of opposing feminism while riding the success of female career advancement in the later 20th century.

For all her various comedy routines about her hatred of liberals and feminism, Coulter is a never-married, over-40 single woman who opted out of being a stay-at-home mother to instead enroll in law school and later become a self-operating freelance professional. The only statement Coulter truly has to be offering the feminist movement of the 60’s is “thank you.”

Indeed, many liberal bloggers have taken note that Ann Coulter doesn’t exactly practice what she preaches, but this commenter sums it all up pretty well.

Feminist Porn

Over the years, I’ve noticed that feminists seem to be highly divided on the issue of porn, and whether they’re for it or against it. One side will say that it’s demeaning towards women. Others say that women shouldn’t be ashamed to express their own sexuality.

Perhaps as a middle point for the two, we have some film awards for feminist pornography.

This particular writer is all in a huff:

Oh Lordy Lordy! The last bastion of male chauvinist pigs is about to fall. A group of feminazis, no doubt high on testosterone, in Toronto has launched a clutch of annual ‘Best Film Awards’ for “feminist pornography”.

Till now we have been told that porn in any form is an assault on the dignity of women, a denial of their right not to be known only as receptacles of male bodily fluids and unquestioning providers of pleasure, often verging on the perverse, to men. Feminist writers and activists have been tirelessly pointing out for decades that the grossness of pornography - we are not talking of dainty pillow books or girlie magazines - only highlights the loathsome crudity of men’s secret desires.

Andrea Dworkin, icon of provocative feminism and high priestess of the movement against porn who died a disgruntled, frustrated and crotchety middle aged woman last year, made intercourse, in her eponymous bestseller, of any kind look filthy, distasteful and dishonourable. Porn, she would often thunder to deafening applause, is the theory; rape is the practice.

In order to try to define what constitutes porn as “feminist porn,” we have this:

And what is the Pepsi difference with feminist porn? For Gallant, there are three criteria that determine whether porn is feminist. The first is that the film shows women getting their fair share of pleasure. “So, real female orgasms, and women are actually having a good time. That’s first and foremost.” Second is that the work be directed or produced by a woman. And third is that it expand the range of female sexual expression currently seen. These criteria still include male filmmakers, as long as they can come in with two out of three. “And we have to think it’s hot,” she laughs.

Funny, I would have thought that one of the requirements would be that the women in the porn had unshaved armpits and legs. ZING!

Related posts: How influential is porn?, Text-messaging is the latest technology for hooking up, Interview with majikthise

The untouchable is now touchable: Abstinence-only education being pushed towards medical students

You ever have one of those instances in elementary or middle school that you look back and wish you knew what you know now so you could raise your hand and argue with the teacher? When I was in middle school and we were having our second installment of sex education (the first was in fifth grade), a stocky, butch PE teacher told us about how sexually transmitted diseases could not only be given through broken condoms, but that they could actually slip THROUGH THE FIBERS of unbroken condoms. Therefore, nothing but abstinence was safe. Boys just wanted sex and you don’t have to prove your love by having sex. I’m sure you’ve heard all this before.

But the great thing about propaganda being shoved down your throat while you’re young is the fact that when you get older, you can figure stuff out on your own (this is why I don’t know why conservatives are getting their panties bunched up over teachers toting their liberal beliefs in the classroom). If I could travel back in time, I could ask the teacher, “What about people who don’t ever want to get married? Which partner should they have sex with?” or any number of rebuttals. But alas, I can’t. Like everyone else in the world, I grew up to learn that sex wasn’t so bad and it didn’t destroy lives and that people have sex all the time (average age of males for losing virginity is 16, I think, and girls are 17).

Realizing all this, conservatives are now pushing their ideology towards a much more dangerous student body: Medical students.

Conservatives teach sex ed to medical students. Thanks, Congress.:

As Michael Specter pointed out in The New Yorker last month, the Bush administration spends hundreds of millions of dollars touting the benefits of abstinence. Most abstinence-promoting programs waste the government’s money funneling misinformation directly to adolescents. But one such group, the Medical Institute for Sexual Health, has another audience in mind—medical students. With the help of Congress, the institute has finagled $200,000 out of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to develop a sexual-health curriculum for doctors in training. It’s a small bit of pork, but it represents the hijacking of a government agency that normally funds research based on merit. And the CDC’s imprimatur could persuade medical schools to use the institute’s work.

As most people know, abstinence-only programs are not only ineffective, they’re dangerous as well. Because all they do is promote ignorance and misinformation, students are unable to take necessary safety precautions and instead end up pregnant or with an STD. Now that this ignorance is being pushed towards medical students, things have gotten so much darker.

The program is headed by Dr. Joe McIlhaney, someone who Feministing has accused of rape and denying emergency contraception to women.

I want to be outraged at all this, but instead I’m just sad.

Frank’s Home Abortion

With the new legislation passed in South Dakota banning abortion, many are worried that this might be the Right’s best chance at overturning Roe v Wade.

Some questions are going through our heads: How then will women be able to get safe, healthy abortions? What is the best method to do so?

Well, I have managed to find one alternative: Frank’s Home Abortion

via mikey