<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging&#8217;s low retention rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggasm.com/bloggings-low-retention-rate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggasm.com/bloggings-low-retention-rate</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/bloggings-low-retention-rate/comment-page-1#comment-83955</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2994#comment-83955</guid>
		<description>People&#039;s expectations aren&#039;t as high as all that. I suspect most newb bloggers would be happy with just some kind of comments or feedback. 

Even that is asking a lot - I&#039;ve read some entertaining and thought-provoking stuff on blogs, &lt;i&gt;original&lt;/i&gt; stuff, that nobody cares about even enough to comment.

Most people these days, I suspect, would rather write than read, and do neither than do either. There are more opinions out there than there will ever be an audience for.

It&#039;s getting hard to even converse IRL with folks there days, never mind blog to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People&#8217;s expectations aren&#8217;t as high as all that. I suspect most newb bloggers would be happy with just some kind of comments or feedback. </p>
<p>Even that is asking a lot &#8211; I&#8217;ve read some entertaining and thought-provoking stuff on blogs, <i>original</i> stuff, that nobody cares about even enough to comment.</p>
<p>Most people these days, I suspect, would rather write than read, and do neither than do either. There are more opinions out there than there will ever be an audience for.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s getting hard to even converse IRL with folks there days, never mind blog to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie in Las Vegas</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/bloggings-low-retention-rate/comment-page-1#comment-83948</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie in Las Vegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2994#comment-83948</guid>
		<description>I started blogging as a lark, and surprised myself by sticking with it.  I&#039;ve been doing it for just over two years now, but never deluded myself into thinking it would be anything more than a hobby.

I never thought I&#039;d have a large readership, so I haven&#039;t been surprised that it isn&#039;t huge.  To be honest though, after all of the growth during last year&#039;s election cycle, it IS sort of a bummer that readership has dwindled away.

I understand the impulse to quit, and I&#039;ve slowed down a bit (at least for the summer).  But that would leave me with no hobbies, so I&#039;ll keep going.

Great blog, thanks for the read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started blogging as a lark, and surprised myself by sticking with it.  I&#8217;ve been doing it for just over two years now, but never deluded myself into thinking it would be anything more than a hobby.</p>
<p>I never thought I&#8217;d have a large readership, so I haven&#8217;t been surprised that it isn&#8217;t huge.  To be honest though, after all of the growth during last year&#8217;s election cycle, it IS sort of a bummer that readership has dwindled away.</p>
<p>I understand the impulse to quit, and I&#8217;ve slowed down a bit (at least for the summer).  But that would leave me with no hobbies, so I&#8217;ll keep going.</p>
<p>Great blog, thanks for the read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thord Daniel Hedengren</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/bloggings-low-retention-rate/comment-page-1#comment-83944</link>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2994#comment-83944</guid>
		<description>Read that one, kind of baffled me that NYT would publish something as one-sided as this.

My point of view in an editorial at the Blog Herald:
http://www.blogherald.com/2009/06/07/blog-bashing-new-york-times-on-orphaned-blogs/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read that one, kind of baffled me that NYT would publish something as one-sided as this.</p>
<p>My point of view in an editorial at the Blog Herald:<br />
<a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/06/07/blog-bashing-new-york-times-on-orphaned-blogs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogherald.com/2009/06/07/blog-bashing-new-york-times-on-orphaned-blogs/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
