And you wonder why we mock the Christian Right
Wow, this post is riddled with so many logical loopholes I don’t know where to begin.
While Homosexual activists encourage students to hold a day of silence in support of homosexuality, Christian groups are offering a counter demonstration: A Day of Truth. From WorldNetDaily…
High-school students nationwide will take part in a “Day of Truth” to counter homosexual activism and peacefully express a Christian perspective.
During school hours, students will wear “Day of Truth” T-shirts and pass out cards, said the Arizona-based public-interest group Alliance Defense Fund, which is sponsoring the April 27 event.
Outside of class time, the students will present the following message:
I am speaking the Truth to break the silence. Silence isn’t freedom. It’s a constraint. Truth tolerates open discussion, because the Truth emerges when healthy discourse is allowed. By proclaiming the Truth in love, hurts will be halted, hearts will be healed, and lives will be saved.
Break the silence about what? When they have a day of “silence” they don’t mean any form of censorship, just as when people have a moment of “silence” about a fallen hero they don’t do so to censor anyone. The people here are deliberately changing the meaning of the word “silence” to distort the meaning of the day.
“that promotes a radical homosexual agenda.”
I’ve heard the words “homosexual agenda” repeated over and over again by conservatives, and yet not once have I ever heard one clearly spell out what the “homosexual agenda” is. To gain more rights in a way that doesn’t affect you? Gee, those darn gays, demanding rights that will never ever have anything to do with the rights of you and me.
“Further north in Liberal Massachusetts, the city of Boston has just hired two, openly homosexual principles for two of their schools…
“This is such a blatant, in-your-face move,” said [Brian] Camenker[, a Newton parent and director of a Waltham-based organization that is fighting same-sex marriage]…”
Yes, a blatant move to hire two principals without discriminating against them over something that has nothing to do with their job.
“While homosexuals are allowed to recruit at government schools, those who want the message that homosexuality is a choice, are more often than not censored thus leaving school children much easier pickings for those who want to convince them that they’ll be forever miserable unless the accept that they are homosexual.”
HAHAHAH. Are you implying that homosexuals go to schools to recruit kids to become gay? I’d really like you to show me a single article about a single incidence where this has happened.
It is to laugh.
