<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6% of Huffington Post&#8217;s front page stories contain original reporting from the site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggasm.com/6-of-huffington-posts-front-page-stories-contain-original-reporting-from-the-site/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggasm.com/6-of-huffington-posts-front-page-stories-contain-original-reporting-from-the-site</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hettie</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/6-of-huffington-posts-front-page-stories-contain-original-reporting-from-the-site/comment-page-1#comment-83889</link>
		<dc:creator>Hettie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2949#comment-83889</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to compare these findings to for instance the New York Times regarding original stories vs opinions vs wire copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to compare these findings to for instance the New York Times regarding original stories vs opinions vs wire copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Payn</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/6-of-huffington-posts-front-page-stories-contain-original-reporting-from-the-site/comment-page-1#comment-83868</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Payn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggasm.com/?p=2949#comment-83868</guid>
		<description>Interesting analysis. It would be interesting to look further and, of the stories that were original reporting, which (if any) were truly original - in both HuffPo and the newspapers. I think that a publication is only making a contribution if the reporting is truly original - adding something that is not reported anywhere else - rather than just going to the original source and reporting from there - perhaps duplicating reporting done in another outlet. I think the greatest contribution any publication can make is to break stories - or break facts within stories - that no other publication has broken. I imagine that all the publications score quite low by that criteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis. It would be interesting to look further and, of the stories that were original reporting, which (if any) were truly original &#8211; in both HuffPo and the newspapers. I think that a publication is only making a contribution if the reporting is truly original &#8211; adding something that is not reported anywhere else &#8211; rather than just going to the original source and reporting from there &#8211; perhaps duplicating reporting done in another outlet. I think the greatest contribution any publication can make is to break stories &#8211; or break facts within stories &#8211; that no other publication has broken. I imagine that all the publications score quite low by that criteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
