Not a single conservative has explained on what basis the LA Times should break the journalist/source privilege by releasing a video they agreed they wouldn’t release. A journalist is supposed to be willing to go to jail in order to protect a confidential source and meet the pre-interview agreements.
So if a journalist isn’t supposed to break that privilege at risk of going to jail, how have conservatives somehow convinced themselves that the LA Times should cave under the weight of their shrieking demands?
They’ve put up rewards for the video as high as $200,000. If the person who shot it wants to come forward with it, then let him or her. I wouldn’t mind seeing the video myself, not that I think it would change my mind on who I’m voting for. But to spend your time beating down on the Times as somehow suppressing the video — when in fact they were the ones that reported on its contents — indicates that said shriekers have no respect or understanding for what journalism is.