Archive for February, 2007

NPR’s This American Life to have its own Showtime television show

I’m a huge fan of This American Life but hardly ever get to listen to it since they don’t offer free podcasts and I’m never in my car when it’s on. But via pajiba I found out that they have a new showtime show coming out. Based on the trailer, it looks like it’s going to be really good. Here’s the trailer below:

***

Related posts: The art of saying “I’m sorry.”, Sign a petition to get Carlos Mencia’s show cancelled

When are porn movies going to be held accountable?

McSweeney’s has done the legwork in this tough-hitting investigative article: GOOFS FOUND IN HOT AND HORNY CHEERLEADERS 5:

Continuity: While getting it on with Jon in his convertible, Jill’s “Lil Devil” tattoo switches from her left buttock to her right buttock and back again several times.

Revealing mistake: Although the movie is about the sexual exploits of a small Northeastern university’s football team and its eager-to-please cheerleaders, all the cars have California plates and the campus looks uncannily like Burbank Community College.

Crew or equipment visible: When the camera pans around during the orgy scene, you can see a fluffer doing Sudoku in the background.

Factual error: When Misty seduces Randy in the locker room, a play can be seen sketched out on the chalkboard behind them. But the play has too many men on the field at once, which would be an automatic 5-yard penalty.

via pajiba

A Wikipedian’s fake “authority”

As Rough Type reports, a New Yorker article last year that profiled Wikipedia doted on a particular Wikipedian who supposedly had a PhD in theology and taught classes, bringing a laptop to his classroom to check Wikipedia in his spare time. This Wikipedian, known as Essjay, was high up in the Wikipedia hierarchy, “one of fourteen Wikipedians authorized to trace I.P. addresses in cases of suspected abuse.”

According to a recent correction issued in the New Yorker, all this information was fake:

Essjay was recommended to Ms. Schiff as a source by a member of Wikipedia’s management team because of his respected position within the Wikipedia community. He was willing to describe his work as a Wikipedia administrator but would not identify himself other than by confirming the biographical details that appeared on his user page … Essjay now says that his real name is Ryan Jordan, that he is twenty-four and holds no advanced degrees, and that he has never taught. He was recently hired by Wikia – a for-profit company affiliated with Wikipedia – as a “community manager”; he continues to hold his Wikipedia positions. He did not answer a message we sent to him; Jimmy Wales, the co-founder of Wikia and of Wikipedia, said of Essjay’s invented persona, “I regard it as a pseudonym and I don’t really have a problem with it.”

Before, the main debate over Wikipedia’s credibility was centered around the question; “What is authority?” Now, it seems we can’t even get a handle on a person’s credentials enough to even move on to that question.

The Al Gore smear

Like any journalist, I viewed the allegations of Al Gore’s hypocrisy with skepticism. Whenever a ball starts rolling exculsively within the conservative noise machine, only to eventually roll into the mainstream media, it has to be tainted. The first I’d heard of it was on the drive to work this morning on Glenn Beck’s radio show. The “facts” for the hypocrisy stems from a special interest group nobody has heard of.

As can easily be predicted, it was all a bunch of noise.

Let’s kill this one off before it gets too much steam.

Rainn Wilson, aka Dwight, on SNL

Rainn Wilson, the actor who plays Dwight on The Office had a funny The Office parody when he was on SNL recently:

via give me my remote

Question

Everyone has been snickering at the idiotic Conservapedia lately, so I was surprised when I skipped on down to Wikipedia today to find that Wikipedians hadn’t thought to create an entry on Conservapedia. Why is this? This would make for some ironic fodder if the very encyclopedia that is accused of being so biased were to rip apart the misconceptions in the encyclopedia that accuses it of said bias.

The 51 Best Magazines Ever

GOOD Magazine has published its list of the 51 Best Magazines Ever. Rather than focusing only on magazines today, not only does it highlight now-defunct magazines, it also pinpoints a few eras of certain magazines. Esquire, for instance, doesn’t make the list in its current incarnation, but rather the version of it from 1961–1973.

I have few a disagreements. I’ve been so impressed with how well Wired has incorporated its print magazine into its web content, so I wouldn’t cut it off at 1998. Why the hell isn’t Harper’s on the list? Its index alone should get it on there. And what about The Economist? It’s known in many circles as one of the most objective publications out there.

The feature also includes a brief history of the magazine industry.

via bookslut


Blog Widget by LinkWithin